Skip to content

Governance

Protocol changes and priorities are decided through community governance: token holders propose options, discuss trade-offs, and record their preferences. Early coordination is gasless and practical; over time, control can move closer to the chain as the system matures.

Proposals and voting

ZeroLedger Token holders can create proposals and vote using ZeroLedger Snapshot Space — a gasless, off-chain signaling layer. It fits early-stage coordination: broad participation without paying gas for every poll, while results remain a clear input for multisig and core contributors who execute changes.

Snapshot strategies (for example token balance or locked positions) are configured per space; exact voting weights and eligibility are set in the project’s Snapshot space as releases evolve.

Path to on-chain governance

As governance matures, execution is intended to move from multisig and off-chain signals toward stronger community control — for example on-chain voting, timelocks, or delegation (holders elect delegates who vote on their behalf). The exact timeline, parameters, and technical design will be announced as each phase is implemented.

What this means in practice

  • Today: prioritize transparent discussion, recorded votes on Snapshot, and aligned execution by the team or multisig where contracts still require it.
  • Tomorrow: deepen verifiable rules and permissionless participation as the protocol’s contracts and operations support it.